For general education, not medical advice. This guide can’t diagnose you or replace care from your own clinician. If you’re worried about a spot or symptom, see a board-certified dermatologist.
squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is the second most common skin cancer. It comes from years of ultraviolet light. It often starts in a precancer called an actinic keratosis. Most tumors are found early and cured with surgery. But unlike BCC, some higher-risk tumors can spread, usually first to nearby lymph nodes. That is why risk features and early treatment matter.
Key points
- SCC is the second most common skin cancer; it comes from sun damage and grows faster than BCC.1
- Most are cured with surgery. A higher-risk minority can spread, so the tumor's risk features guide how it is treated and followed.2
- A biopsy confirms it, and people with a weak immune system are higher-risk and need closer skin checks.3
What is squamous cell carcinoma?
SCC is a cancer of the flat (squamous) cells in the outer layer of skin. The main cause is years of ultraviolet light from the sun or tanning beds. It often grows on the most sun-exposed areas: the face, ears, lips, scalp, and backs of the hands. It is common, with hundreds of thousands of cases each year in the United States.1
Most SCCs are cured by removing them. They are taken seriously because some higher-risk tumors can grow deep and spread, usually first to nearby lymph nodes. Spread is uncommon overall. It is more likely with certain tumors, so the risk features below shape the plan.2
Signs and what to look for
SCC can show up in several ways. Any spot that is new, growing, tender, or not healing is worth checking. Common signs include:
- A firm red bump or nodule
- A rough, scaly, or crusted patch that may bleed
- A sore that does not heal, or heals and comes back
- A wart-like growth or a tender, raised spot, sometimes on the lip or ear
A spot that grows quickly, hurts, or bleeds easily is worth getting looked at sooner.
How it is diagnosed
Diagnosis starts with a skin exam and is confirmed with a biopsy, where a small sample is checked under the microscope. The biopsy shows the type and grade of the tumor, which helps sort it into a risk group.3
Some tumors are higher-risk, which means they are more likely to come back or spread. A tumor is higher-risk if it is large, grows deep, is a higher grade, grows along a nerve, sits on the ear or lip, or grows in someone with a weak immune system.2 Higher-risk tumors may need imaging or a check of the lymph nodes, plus closer follow-up.
How it is treated
Most SCCs are cured with treatment done in the office. The choice depends on the tumor's risk group, size, and location. The grid covers local treatment. Each row applies to certain risk groups. It is not a ranking that fits every SCC.
Read all source findings
Surgical excision
Brodland DG, Zitelli JA. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1992;27(2 Pt 1):241–248.
Prospective microscopic-extension study using Mohs margin assessment: 4 mm was sufficient for most primary SCCs, while high-risk features called for at least 6 mm. This is not proof that one fixed margin suits every high-risk tumor.
Lansbury L, Bath-Hextall F, Perkins W, Stanton W, Leonardi-Bee J. BMJ. 2013;347:f6153.
Review of 118 observational studies: pooled local recurrence after standard excision was 5.4%. Tumor selection, risk, and follow-up varied, so it cannot establish a head-to-head ranking.
Spyropoulou GA, Pavlidis L, Trakatelli M, et al. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34(7):1478–1481.
Retrospective review of 525 SCCs identified 24 incompletely excised lesions. Fifteen of those 24 (62.5%) showed poorer differentiation on re-excision. The authors advised re-excision except for people unwilling or unfit for another procedure.
Kim JYS, Kozlow JH, Mittal B, et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;78(3):560–578.
AAD: low-risk primary cSCC can have standard excision with a 4 to 6 mm clinical margin and histologic margin assessment. High-risk disease needs careful margin control.
Mohs surgery (margin-controlled; high-risk / recurrent sites)
Lansbury L, Bath-Hextall F, Perkins W, Stanton W, Leonardi-Bee J. BMJ. 2013;347:f6153.
Pooled analysis: margin-controlled surgery had about 3.0% local recurrence, non-significantly lower than standard excision (5.4%); the data are observational, not randomized.
Kim JYS, Kozlow JH, Mittal B, et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;78(3):560–578.
AAD guideline: margin-controlled surgery is reserved for high-risk, recurrent, and critical-site tumors.
Curettage & electrodesiccation or cryotherapy (low-risk only)
Lansbury L, Bath-Hextall F, Perkins W, Stanton W, Leonardi-Bee J. BMJ. 2013;347:f6153.
Observational pooled recurrence was 1.7% after curettage and electrodesiccation and 0.8% after freezing, mostly in small low-risk tumors. Selection and varied follow-up prevent reliable comparison with surgery.
Kim JYS, Kozlow JH, Mittal B, et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;78(3):560–578.
AAD: curettage and electrodesiccation may be considered for small low-risk primary SCC outside terminal hair-bearing sites. Cryosurgery should be considered only for low-risk lesions when more effective therapies are contraindicated or impractical.
Radiotherapy (non-surgical candidates; adjuvant)
Lansbury L, Bath-Hextall F, Perkins W, Stanton W, Leonardi-Bee J. BMJ. 2013;347:f6153.
Pooled observational local recurrence after external-beam radiotherapy was 6.4%. Different patients and tumor risks mean this is not a randomized comparison with surgery.
Kim JYS, Kozlow JH, Mittal B, et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;78(3):560–578.
AAD: radiotherapy can be considered for selected nonsurgical candidates. Adjuvant radiation may be considered for concerning perineural invasion or high metastatic risk; high-level evidence for that benefit was lacking in this guideline.
Surgery is the standard first-line treatment for most localized tumors. The surgeon removes a margin of skin around the tumor and checks the tissue edges. High-risk tumors need a plan that confirms clear edges.4 For high-risk, recurrent, or critical-site tumors, a margin-controlled technique, known as Mohs surgery, checks the entire edge of the removed tissue under the microscope during the procedure; guidelines reserve it for those situations.3
Radiation may be used when surgery is unsuitable. A specialist may consider it after surgery for concerning nerve involvement or other high-risk features; an involved margin needs an individual plan. Scraping and cautery may suit selected small, low-risk tumors. Freezing has a narrower role when more effective treatments are unsuitable or impractical.3
Drug treatment led by an oncology team
These treatments serve different goals. Shrinking a tumor that cannot be removed, lowering the risk of return, and clearing cancer cells before surgery are not the same outcome. The percentages below should not be compared as if they came from one trial.
If surgery and radiation cannot cure the cancer. Anti-PD-1 infusions help immune cells attack SCC. In early cemiplimab studies, response rates were 50% in a phase 1 group and 47% in a phase 2 group with distant spread.5 A separate study of cancer grown far into nearby tissue found a 44% response rate, including 13% with a complete response.6 A pembrolizumab trial found a response in 34.3%. Disease control, which also counted stable cancer, was 52.4%.7 These were single-group trials, not comparisons between the drugs. Response does not mean cure. Some responses last, but some cancers do not respond or later grow.
After surgery and radiation for certain high-risk tumors. The C-POST trial compared cemiplimab with placebo in 415 people. At two years, 87.1% of the cemiplimab group and 64.1% of the placebo group were alive without the cancer returning. The hazard ratio for return or death was 0.32. Local and distant returns were both less common. That report showed a disease-free benefit, not proof of longer overall survival. Grade 3 or worse adverse events occurred in 23.9% versus 14.2%; adverse events led 9.8% versus 1.5% to stop treatment. These results apply to the trial's high-risk group after both surgery and radiation, not every SCC.8
Before surgery for selected tumors that can still be removed. In a single-group study of 79 people, cemiplimab left no live cancer cells in the removed tissue in 51%. Another 13% had a major response, with very few live cancer cells left. This is a tissue response, not proof of cure or longer survival. Surgery remained part of the plan. This approach is still investigational and is not FDA-approved before surgery. It is not a substitute for surgery or a routine choice for small, low-risk SCC.9 At the final follow-up, about four and a half years later, 76.2% were alive without an event such as cancer growth, return, or death. Overall survival was 79.4%. None of the 40 people with a complete tissue response had a return of cancer. No new grade 3 or worse adverse events were reported. These are encouraging results, but there was no control group. They cannot show how much the drug added to surgery and later care. Only 70 of the 79 people went on to surgery. In two, the cancer grew so much that surgery could not be done.10
Immune treatment can harm healthy organs. People with a transplant need special care because it can also threaten the transplanted organ. Discuss risks and benefits with the cancer and transplant teams before treatment.3
Other options patients ask about
Black salve or Cansema. Do not use these products for SCC. Tissue studies show dead or damaged healthy skin and cancer left behind. A scab falling off does not show that all the cancer is gone. The evidence shows harm, without a proven safe cure.1112
Home removal or leftover creams. Do not cut, burn, freeze, or apply acids to a spot that might be cancer. A biopsy is needed to learn its type and depth. Creams used for precancers or SCC in situ are not a standard treatment for invasive SCC. The same rule applies to light therapy: an option for some surface disease is not proof of a cure for invasive cancer.313
Natural cures, herbs, diets, or supplements. None has been shown to cure invasive SCC. Products can cause harm or interact with treatment. Tell your care team what you take. Relief of symptoms and support during care are useful goals, but do not replace cancer treatment.14
Delaying or declining treatment. Some SCCs grow deep or spread. Do not assume that a small or painless spot is safe to leave. If illness, frailty, cost, or fear makes treatment hard, ask for a plan that weighs those concerns. Comfort-focused care is a valid goal when chosen with your team; it differs from leaving a cancer unchecked.3
Special note for people with a weakened immune system
Organ-transplant recipients and others on long-term immune-suppressing medicine get many more SCCs, and the tumors tend to behave more aggressively.2 If this is you, regular skin checks and prompt treatment of new spots are especially important, and care is usually coordinated with your transplant or specialty team.
Lowering your risk and catching new ones early
Most of the risk comes from ultraviolet light, so sun protection lowers the chance of new skin cancers over time. Treating precancers (actinic keratoses) also helps. For high-risk patients, a daily vitamin (nicotinamide) lowered new skin cancers in a trial, and selected transplant patients may be offered a prescription retinoid.
Cumulative ultraviolet light is the main driver of squamous cell carcinoma, so reducing UV exposure lowers the risk. In a randomized trial, regular sunscreen use lowered the rate of new squamous cell cancers over years of follow-up.
About 30% fewer new squamous cell cancers at one year in a trial of high-risk patients; the benefit only lasts while you take it.
A randomized trial found fewer squamous cell cancers in transplant recipients, but side effects limit use to selected patients and tumors can rebound when it is stopped.
Whole-body prevention, separate from the spot treatments above. “No effect” means good trials found no benefit. Every source is PubMed-verified; not medical advice.
Having one SCC raises the chance of getting another, so regular skin checks are an important part of care after a diagnosis.
When to see a doctor
See a clinician for any spot that is growing, scaly, tender, bleeding, or not healing, especially on sun-exposed skin like the face, ears, lips, scalp, or hands. If you have had a SCC before, or you take immune-suppressing medicine, keep up with regular skin checks.
Worried about a spot?
SpotDoc offers full-body skin cancer screening in Brownwood Square, The Villages. No referral needed for most plans.
Frequently asked questions
Is SCC dangerous? Most are cured when treated early. The concern is the higher-risk minority that can grow deep or spread, usually first to nearby lymph nodes. The tumor's risk features guide how closely it is treated and followed.2
How is it different from BCC? Both come from sun damage, but SCC grows faster and is more likely to spread, while BCC almost never spreads. Both are usually cured with surgery when caught early.
Will it come back? Most tumors are cured. Cancer left at the edge raises the chance of recurrence, so margins are checked and an involved edge is re-removed.15 Having one SCC also raises the chance of getting another, so ongoing skin checks matter.
Do I need Mohs surgery? Not for every tumor. Mohs is a margin-controlled technique that guidelines reserve for high-risk, recurrent, or critical-site tumors.3 Your clinician can tell you whether your tumor falls into that group.
Why does my immune system matter? People on immune-suppressing medicine, such as transplant recipients, get many more SCCs and more aggressive ones.2 They need closer skin checks and prompt treatment.
Questions to ask your clinician
- What risk group is my tumor, and does it need imaging or a lymph node check?
- Which treatment fits this spot, and will the edges be checked for clear margins?
- Do I need radiation after surgery for any reason?
- How often should I have skin checks now?
- I take immune-suppressing medicine, so how does that change my plan?
SCC is one of several skin cancers and precancers. Related guides cover actinic keratosis (its common precancer), BCC, and the treatments above, including surgical excision. A thorough skin cancer screening is the place to start.
Reviewed by Tyler Long, DO. Last reviewed November 3, 2026.
Update log
How this guide has changed since it was first published.
- November 3, 2026Separated advanced-treatment evidence and its limits, and added patient safety information. Reviewed and accepted for publication November 3, 2026.
- July 14, 2026Guide published.
References
Sources supporting this guide are listed below, with links to the publications or issuing organizations. Numbers match the citations in the text and the grids above.
- Karia PS, Han J, Schmults CD. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: estimated incidence of disease, nodal metastasis, and deaths from disease in the United States, 2012. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013;68(6):957–966.View source
- Thompson AK, Kelley BF, Prokop LJ, Murad MH, Baum CL. Risk factors for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma recurrence, metastasis, and disease-specific death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol. 2016;152(4):419–428.View source
- Kim JYS, Kozlow JH, Mittal B, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;78(3):560–578.View source
- Brodland DG, Zitelli JA. Surgical margins for excision of primary cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1992;27(2 Pt 1):241–248.View source
- Migden MR, Rischin D, Schmults CD, et al. PD-1 blockade with cemiplimab in advanced cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(4):341–351.View source
- Migden MR, Khushalani NI, Chang ALS, et al. Cemiplimab in locally advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: results from an open-label, phase 2, single-arm trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(2):294–305.View source
- Grob JJ, Gonzalez R, Basset-Seguin N, et al. Pembrolizumab monotherapy for recurrent or metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: a single-arm phase II trial (KEYNOTE-629). J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(25):2916–2925.View source
- Rischin D, Khushalani NI, Schmults CD, et al. Adjuvant cemiplimab in high-risk cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma (C-POST). N Engl J Med. 2025;392(21):2092–2104.View source
- Gross ND, Miller DM, Khushalani NI, et al. Neoadjuvant cemiplimab for stage II to IV cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(17):1557–1568.View source
- Gross ND, Miller DM, Khushalani NI, et al. Phase II Study of Neoadjuvant Cemiplimab for Stage II to IV Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Final Analysis. J Clin Oncol. Published online October 24, 2026. doi:10.1200/JCO-26-02166.View source
- Croaker A, Liu L, Myers SP. Persisting cancer in black salve treated skin lesions: results of a large 5-year retrospective analysis of Australian histopathology specimens. Integr Cancer Ther. 2023;22:15347354221151145.View source
- Leecy TN, Beer TW, Harvey NT, et al. Histopathological features associated with application of black salve to cutaneous lesions: a series of 16 cases and review of the literature. Pathology. 2013;45(7):670–674.View source
- Feldstein S, Afshar M, Krakowski AC. Chemical burn from vinegar following an internet-based protocol for self-removal of nevi. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2015;8(6):50.View source
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. Cancer and Complementary Health Approaches: What You Need To Know. National Institutes of Health. Accessed November 3, 2026.View source
- Spyropoulou GA, Pavlidis L, Trakatelli M, et al. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with incomplete margins demonstrate higher tumour grade on re-excision. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34(7):1478–1481.View source
- Lansbury L, Bath-Hextall F, Perkins W, Stanton W, Leonardi-Bee J. Interventions for non-metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the skin: systematic review and pooled analysis of observational studies. BMJ. 2013;347:f6153.View source
- Green A, Williams G, Neale R, et al. Daily sunscreen application and betacarotene supplementation in prevention of basal-cell and squamous-cell carcinomas of the skin: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 1999;354(9180):723–729.View source
- van der Pols JC, Williams GM, Pandeya N, Logan V, Green AC. Prolonged prevention of squamous cell carcinoma of the skin by regular sunscreen use. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15(12):2546–2548.View source
- Chen AC, Martin AJ, Choy B, et al. A Phase 3 Randomized Trial of Nicotinamide for Skin-Cancer Chemoprevention. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(17):1618–1626.View source
- George R, Weightman W, Russ GR, Bannister KM, Mathew TH. Acitretin for chemoprevention of non-melanoma skin cancers in renal transplant recipients. Australas J Dermatol. 2002;43(4):269–273.View source
